A disagreement between lammps code and the manu

Yes it is I have requested to this to be corrected long time ago !.



Looked at the code. Etail is included in evdwl (if the pair style tail flag is turned on).


"epair = pairwise energy (evdwl + ecoul + elong + etail)".

is correct in the sense that etail is included.  But it's not

counted twice, which is why the output looks like evdwl+ecoul+elong

since evdwl includes etail.

I'll clarify this on the doc page for the thermo_style command.