Can LAMMPS do MDPD on windows ?

Dear LAMMPS,

Would you mind suggesting me how to perform MDPD in LAMMPS on windows version ?

Best Regards,

Suphanat

Dear LAMMPS,

Would you mind suggesting me how to perform MDPD in LAMMPS on windows
version ?

there is no fundamental difference between the LAMMPS capabilities on
Windows or any other operating system. what LAMMPS can or cannot do is
documented in the manual.

pre-compiled binary distributions of LAMMPS on *any* operating system,
however, may not include all available features for lots of different
reasons.
you can determine the availability of specific optional styles by
running the LAMMPS executable with the -h flag and checking the
output.
if something is missing, you may have to compile a custom executable
for yourself. this used to be the default mode of obtaining LAMMPS.
pre-compiled binaries are provided as a courtesy.

axel.

Dear Axel,

Thank you for your answer !

Now my research interests is in Many-body DPD, can it be done in LAMMPS ?

I think there is no specific command for this problem and I’m not so good to write a code by my own.

Thus, would you mind suggesting an acceptable way of LAMMPS to add attractive force to DPD or simulate a MDPD system ?

Thank you very much if you can suggest me the solution !

Best Regards,

Suphanat

Dear Axel,

Thank you for your answer !

Now my research interests is in Many-body DPD, can it be done in LAMMPS ?

I think there is no specific command for this problem and I'm not so good to
write a code by my own.

Thus, would you mind suggesting an acceptable way of LAMMPS to add
attractive force to DPD or simulate a MDPD system ?

if the feature you are looking for is not implemented in LAMMPS, and
you don't want to program it yourself, then there is no way short of
hiring somebody to do the programming for you.

axel.

Dear Axel,

Is it acceptable to add in LJ potentials to use for the part of attractive force in MDPD ?

Best Regards,

Suphanat

Dear Axel,

Is it acceptable to add in LJ potentials to use for the part of attractive
force in MDPD ?

how the hell should *i* know? this is *your* research, so it is *your*
task to figure out what is an acceptable model.
considering your line of questioning so far, my guess would be: no.

whatever you do, you need to validate your approach against published
results. and for that it is completely irrelevant what a random person
on a mailing list tells you is acceptable. you need dependable facts
and you need to understand what you are doing. research cannot work by
free random association of software features.

at this point, it is probably advisable to have a discussion with your
supervisor on this.

axel.