Please carefully study the post: Please Read This First: Guidelines and Suggestions for posting LAMMPS questions
and that includes expanding all the black triangles to read all the details.
Your post is violating several of those, most importantly the process of properly quoting text files (just look at it. does it seem right to you? does it look exactly as the text you copied??).
You don’t seem to grasp how simulations work:
- you set up your test geometry
- you select your potential and simulation settings
- you run the simulation and observe and analyze properties
- if you don’t get the expected results that either your model, settings, and method are not suitable for the simulation you did or your expectations are not correct.
If there was a “give me the results I want” kind of command, there would be very little meaning in doing simulations in the first place. It is important to understand that the results you get are for the models and methods you are using, not for the material itself.
They are documented. The Nose-Hoover fixes have many options that can be combined in many ways, it requires careful reading and checking to figure out the meaning of each of them. There will be no section where you can find an example explained specifically for just you.
This just confirms that you need to study the documentation specifically for fix npt with far more care and attention to detail.
This is a completely unrelated question and should be posted in the “LAMMPS Installation” category. But - yet again - underlines the need to spend more time and care to read the LAMMPS manual. Enabling optional packages during compilation of LAMMPS is explained there with great detail and thus your question redundant.