Dear users:
As I know, there was a modification to the use of “Fix langevin” concerning the “angmom” case. However, I found it also affect my use of command as:
fix 1 sub_g langevin 300 300 301 123456 zero yes
fix a1 all nve
where, the keyword “zero yes” brings an error. It can only run after removing it, which means the additional force applied to the thermostat cannot be zero-out?
Any suggestions to overcome it?
Thanks & Best Regards!
Dai Ling
Scientist
Institue of High Performance Computing, A*STAR
Singapore
Tel: +65-64191428
Dear users:
As I know, there was a modification to the use of “Fix langevin” concerning
the “angmom” case. However, I found it also affect my use of command as:
fix 1 sub_g langevin 300 300 301 123456 zero yes
fix a1 all nve
where, the keyword “zero yes” brings an error. It can only run after
removing it, which means the additional force applied to the thermostat
cannot be zero-out?
Any suggestions to overcome it?
your report is incomplete - so it is impossible to properly verify
it. your conclusions are wrong, since i can use the zero yes option
without an error on the current version of LAMMPS.
axel.