Dear Prof. Axel van de Walle and ATAT users,
I’ve got 3 new unknown ground states in newgs.out after running maps. Could you please tell me how to output its structural information?
Thank you very much!
Cathy
Dear Prof. Axel van de Walle and ATAT users,
I’ve got 3 new unknown ground states in newgs.out after running maps. Could you please tell me how to output its structural information?
Thank you very much!
Cathy
These should be output next as you do
touch ready
. New gs have priority to be written to disk over other structures.
Dear Prof. van de Walle,
Thanks for your kindly reply. After calculating these new ground states, maps.log shows that "true ground states differ from fitted ground states". My command line is "mags -g 16 &". Could you tell me how can I deal with this problem ?
Thank you very much!
Cathy
It could take a few iterations to resolve the problem (i.e. re-output the new predicted ground states and calculate them, etc.)
If the problem seems to take forever to correct itself, it is probably due to one of the following:
Dear Prof. van de Walle,
Thanks for your kindly reply! Recently, I want to get a phase boundary by phb. And I need to specify the starting temperature. But I have no idea about how to choose the starting chemical potential -mu. The example you given is "-T=100 -mu=0.125". My command line is "phb -gs1=0 -gs2=3 -T=500 -mu=? -dT=50 -dx=1e-3 -er=50 -k=8.617e-5 -ltep=5e-3 -o=ph0.out".Could you give me some advice ?
Thank you very much!
Cathy
If you start at a low T (say, < 100K), you can let the code use its default value: it will use the ground state energies to find the mu,
If you start at a higher T, then either