Hi Alex,
see footer with a few topics + external links that have related details*
Some quick answers:
- Deprecation meaning in
summaryand property collections: Thedeprecatedfield for both thesummaryandmaterialscollections reflects whether or not the material is deprecated,deprecatedin the property collections (likeelasticity) reflect whether that property is deprecated.- property documents are typically not even built for deprecated materials, so none of the property collections outside of
elasticityeven have deprecated entries.elasticityis “special” only because we could not outright remove data (without having a replacement dataset ready) that had been valid up until the sanity checks that were implemented in database versions v2025.02.12.post & v2025.02.12.post1
- property documents are typically not even built for deprecated materials, so none of the property collections outside of
- Differences between the legacy website & next-gen: All data shown on the legacy website was essentially frozen at the time of the next-gen switch. Some static data products might have been migrated, but in general the data on the legacy website and the next-gen website (+
mp-apiresponses) should be considered disparate data sets, so the legacyelasticitydata has no relation to the data shown on the current website. The workflows that produced the data are even different (very different if I remember correctly). - next-gen showing nothing for those two materials: The website does not show
deprecatedentries in any of the interfaces/apps but they are available viamp-api.
*links
25 elasticity entries with unphysical tensor components …
Nine unflagged materials with impossible elastic moduli … emmet #1499
Unreasonable elastic moduli
Related topics 2024 - Sept 12th
v2025.02.12.post changelog
v2025.02.12.post1 changelog