Dear LAMMPS users,
I am trying to obtain a cluster size distribution for nanoparticle - polymer system, where the nanoparticle is modelled as an icosahedra. I am trying to define a cluster based on the “Central” atom of the icosahedra. I am attaching a small portion of my script for reference. I am showing the pair potentials relevant to the “Central” atom group only.
group CEN type 1 (This is atom group of my interest to calculate the cluster size dist)
group PAR type 2
group POL type 3
pair_coeff 1 2 mie/cut 0.0 1.0 100.0 50.0 (#No non-bonded interaction between particles on vertex and central atom)
pair_modify shift yes
pair_coeff 1 1 mie/cut 0.0 1.0 100.0 50.0 (#No non-bonded interaction between central atoms of different icosahedra)
pair_modify shift yes
pair_coeff 1 3 mie/cut 0.0 1.0 100.0 50.0 (#No non-bonded interaction between central atoms and monomer beads)
comm_modify cutoff 10.0 (#I do not provide any neighbor commands. (Default settings apply)).
#CLUSTER SIZE DISTRIBUTION
compute cluster CEN cluster/atom 3.134
compute cc2 CEN chunk/atom c_cluster compress yes
compute size CEN property/chunk cc2 count
fix 6 all ave/histo 1 1 1 0 32 32 c_size mode vector ave running beyond ignore file tmp.histo
I use max value as 32 in ave/histo since I have 32 central atoms in my system (32 nanoparticles)
The output file looks something like this:
For timestep 0:
Histogrammed data for fix 6
TimeStep Number-of-bins Total-counts Missing-counts Min-value Max-value
Bin Coord Count Count/Total
0 32 32 0 0 1
1 0.5 0 0
2 1.5 32 1
3 2.5 0 0
4 3.5 0 0
5 4.5 0 0
6 5.5 0 0
7 6.5 0 0
For timestep 1:
1 32 64 0 0 1
1 0.5 0 0
2 1.5 64 1
3 2.5 0 0
4 3.5 0 0
5 4.5 0 0
6 5.5 0 0
7 6.5 0 0
and so on…
Also, this is a system with small clusters and not in any way a single cluster system. I am unable to find where the issue lies.
Secondly, I use
COORD/ATOM
compute ccord CEN coord/atom cutoff 3.134 group CEN
dump 3 CEN custom ${thermo_steps} coord.dat id c_ccord
dump_modify 3 sort id
The output looks something like this:
ITEM: ATOMS id c_ccord
13 0
26 0
39 0
52 0
65 0
78 0
91 0
104 0
117 0
Again, this output doesn’t correspond to a system with clusters.
Any suggestions would be helpful.
Regards
Sameer