Discussion about an old topic: Getting different result between using free surface and shrink-wrap boundary conditions

Continuing the discussion from [lammps-users] Getting different result between using free surface and shrink-wrap boundary conditions:

Dear Axel, I have a question to consult you. As we know from this discussion topic, a same nanowire within different sizes of simulation cell will lead to different pressure values (or tensile stress values). So, whether the comparison of results from different researchers is meaningless (unless the box size is same for a same size nanowire) ? If it is meaningful, how to conveniently compare the results from different researchers using different box size (because we cannot ensure that all researchers use same box sizes or boundary condition) ? And I think the “real volume” (the space filled with atoms) of the nanowire should be used when calculating the pressure or stress (although it is difficult to calculate the volume of atoms especially on the surface), because only in that way the results from different researchers are meaningful and convenient to compare. Looking forward to your opinions, thank you very much.

This is not really a LAMMPS topic but rather a more general question about reproducibility and thus it is off-topic for any of the LAMMPS categories, but should rather be recategorized to something else like “Science Talk”.

In the particular case of a nanowire as discussed in the message from the mailing list archive, the discussion about (global) pressure is rather pointless since it is an ill defined property to begin with.