How to solve neights=0

I am using LAMMPS to calculate viscosity and can obtain the result, but I found that neights is 0 in the calculation process file. How can I modify this?Below are part of my codes:
units metal
dimension 3
boundary p p p
atom_style full
neighbor 2.0 bin
neigh_modify every 1 delay 0 check yes
variable T equal 3000 # run temperature
variable Tinit equal 3050.0 # equilibration temperature
variable V equal vol
variable P equal 1
variable dt equal 1 #dt
variable p equal 200 # correlation length
variable s equal 2 # sample interval
variable d equal $p*$s # dump interval

#set structure

read_data 384

define CRG potential

pair_style hybrid buck/coul/long 8 morse 11
pair_coeff 1 1 buck/coul/long 18600 0.23066 0.0 #A、rho、C
pair_coeff 1 2 buck/coul/long 11447.471 0.32235 0.0
pair_coeff 2 2 buck/coul/long 830.283 0.352856 3.884372
pair_coeff 1 2 morse 1.2269 1.4482 1.998
kspace_style pppm 1.0e-5
kspace_modify gewald 0.1

convert from LAMMPS real units to SI

variable kB equal 1.3806504e-23
variable atm2Pa equal 101325.0
variable A2m equal 1.0e-10
variable fs2s equal 1.0e-15
variable convert equal {atm2Pa}*{atm2Pa}{fs2s}*{A2m}{A2m}*{A2m}

#minimize
thermo 100
dump 1 all atom 10 mini.lammpstrj
min_style cg
minimize 1e-15 1e-15 10000 10000
undump 1
reset_timestep 0

equilibration and thermalization

velocity all create 3000 12345678 mom yes rot no dist gaussian
fix 1 all npt temp 3000 3000 10 iso 1.0 1.0 1000

thermo $d
timestep 0.0001
run 20000
reset_timestep 0

and this is part of my log file and i wonder it is right for me to just check the last MPI task timing breakdown?

This is not properly formatted. Can you read it as it should? I cannot.
Please see see the forum guidelines post for how to properly format.

What is your concern here? Did LAMMPS not compute what you asked it to do?
Please note the neighborlist statistics is a pure diagnostic and with complex hybrid pair styles, LAMMPS may not find a representative neighbor list for the system. Even if it does, the results are for that one neighbor list only and not the remaining lists for other sub-styles.

Why do you use this setting? Your results can be seriously wrong, if you choose the wrong value. How did you determine this value? What does LAMMPS output for the PPPM setup, when you comment out this line and how does it differ from setting gewald manually?

In modeling there are no absolute “rights” or “wrongs”, but only choices that are better or worse for a specific purpose. Models are by definition always wrong, but they can still teach us important lessons.