Inquiry regarding cluster deposition

Dear Lammpsers,

I am writing to inquire about using a proper fix command in Phase(5) of my input file .

As per this file input file, after reaching the initial equilibrium condition of the particle & substrate at 300 K. the particle(cluster of atoms) impacted to the substrate using fix npt command and velocity commands.

But, the problem is that it is expected when particle impacts to the substrate, its temperature rapidly increases to a maximum with respect to the time and then decreases. But, I cannot see this trend. Rather, temperature just increases in the thermo results. So, I think I should modify this command.

So, any help on this matter is highly appreciated.

Best regards,
Bahman Daneshian

#Phase 1 ------------------------------------------Simulation main setup----------------------------------
dimension 3
units metal
atom_style charge
boundary p p p

#simulation box
region box block 0 90 0 4 -30 70
create_box 2 box

lattice custom 1 a1 4.59373 0.00000 0.00000 a2 0.0000 4.59373 0.00000 a3 0.00000 0.00000 2.95812 &
basis 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 &
basis 0.5000 0.5000 0.5000 &
basis 0.3053 0.3053 0.0000 &
basis 0.6947 0.6947 0.0000 &
basis 0.8053 0.1947 0.5000 &
basis 0.1947 0.8053 0.5000
mass 1 16.00
mass 2 47.86

#particle
region particle cylinder y 45 40 20 0 4 units box
create_atoms 2 region particle &
basis 1 1 &
basis 2 1 &
basis 3 2 &
basis 4 2 &
basis 5 2 &
basis 6 2
group particle region particle

#substrate
region substrate block 0 90 0 4 -20 10 units box
create_atoms 2 region substrate &
basis 1 1 &
basis 2 1 &
basis 3 2 &
basis 4 2 &
basis 5 2 &
basis 6 2
group substrate region substrate

#substrate_bottom
region substrate_bottom block 0 90 0 4 -30 -20 units box
create_atoms 2 region substrate_bottom &
basis 1 1 &
basis 2 1 &
basis 3 2 &
basis 4 2 &
basis 5 2 &
basis 6 2
group substrate_bottom region substrate_bottom
group model union particle substrate

set type 1 charge 2.196
set type 2 charge -1.098
#–Phase 2----------------------------------------Buckingham Potential-----------------------------------------------

Potential

buck/coul/long 2.5

pair_style buck/coul/cut 2.5
pair_coeff 1 1 31120 0.154 5.250
pair_coeff 1 2 16958 0.194 12.590
pair_coeff 2 2 11783 0.234 30.220
#kspace_style ewald 1.0e-4
#—Phase 3----------------------------------------Compute—how can I monitor Vparticle!!! ------------------------
compute temp_particle_1 all temp/region particle
compute temp_particle_2 particle temp/com
compute temp_substrate all temp/region substrate

#----Phase 4-------------------------------------Initial Equilibration at 300K ----------------------------------------
reset_timestep 0
timestep 0.001

velocity model create 300 12345 mom yes rot no
fix 1 particle nvt temp 300.0 300.0 0.01
fix 2 substrate nvt temp 300.0 300.0 0.01
thermo 100
thermo_style custom step c_temp_particle_1 c_temp_substrate
dump 1 all image 200 image..png type type adiam 1.5 axes yes 0.8 0.02 zoom 2.0 view 80 -90
dump_modify 1 backcolor white boxcolor white acolor 1
2 blue/red/orange/green/cyan/aqua/yellow/red
run 1000
unfix 1
unfix 2
#----Phase 5---------------------------------------Particle Impact at the room temperature --------------------
reset_timestep 0
timestep 0.001
fix 3 model npt temp 300 300 1 iso 0 0 100
fix 4 substrate temp/rescale 600 300 300 1.0 1.0
thermo 100
thermo_style custom step c_temp_particle_2 c_temp_substrate

velocity particle set 0 0 -8.0 sum no

dump 2 all image 200 image..png type type adiam 1.5 axes yes 0.8 0.02 zoom 2.0 view 80 -90
dump_modify 2 backcolor white boxcolor white acolor 1
2 blue/red/orange/green/cyan/aqua/yellow/red
run 5000

it looks to me, like you need to discuss your work (in person) with somebody that is experienced in such MD simulations. this mailing list cannot teach your how to do MD simulations properly, and a quick look at your input raises many questions. here are a few.

are you sure that a cutoff of 2.5 \AA is a good choice for your potentials, particularly for coulomb? where did you find that value?

have you made a test whether you can conserve energy in a simulation of your substrate only, using no thermostats (that is with fix nve alone) after a suitable equilibration period?

1ps equilibration is extremely short, not much can happen in such a short time, so are you sure that you are not seeing your equilibration happening during your observation/production run?

also, your thermostats are messed up, some atoms appear to be thermostatted twice. if that is true, it is a very bad idea. …and what is the point of thermostatting during a short 5ps production run in the first place? not much can happen in such a short time.

axel.

Dear Axel,

Thank you very much for detail comments. I am working on them. thank you for your time.

Best regards,
Bahman