I would like to report an apparent inconsistency in the space group assignments for two materials in your database:
MP-1271198 https://next-gen.materialsproject.org/materials/mp-1271198?chemsys=Fe))
Observed Discrepancy:
- Both materials are listed with the orthorhombic space group Cmcm on their MP entries.
- However:
- The automatically generated description of lattice parameters (particularly β ≠ 90°) suggest monoclinic symmetry .
- Independent symmetry analysis using
pymatgen
(symprec=0.01 Å) and VESTA consistently identifies these structures as P21/m.
Verification Steps Taken:
Confirmed the P21/m assignment viaSpacegroupAnalyzer
in pymatgen.- Cross-validated using FINDSYM (tolerance=0.001 Å), which also indicates monoclinic symmetry.
- Could you verify whether:
- The Cmcm assignment is intentional (e.g., due to specific calculation settings)?
- This might be a database entry error?
- If confirmed as P21/m, could the entries be updated?
- Attachments:
- CIF files for both materials (downloaded from MP).