[lammps-users] [Help] About eam/alloy potential

Hi, everyone

I am Jervis Chu. I am new to LAMMPS.

Recently I use the potential AlCu.eam.alloy in LAMMPS library to test weather the calculated result is reliable. I used the Al2Cu crystalline as the initial structure. But unfortunately, the structure is not stable even at 0.1K, while the experimental crystalline is stable even at room temperature. My questions are:

(1) Is there any problem with my LAMMPS script?

(2) Is the EAM potential suitable for the Al2Cu crystalline?

The LAMMPS script is just like:

units metal
dimension 3
newton on
boundary p p p
atom_style atomic

variable f index Al2Cu
variable freq equal 100
read_data $f.xrd

pair_style eam/alloy #assign eam/alloy potential
pair_coeff * * AlCu.eam.alloy Cu Al
#provided in LAMMPS /library directory, the atom labeled #1 are copper atoms in input file

neighbor 0.4 bin
neigh_modify delay 10

velocity all create 0.1 2349852 mom yes rot yes sum yes dist gaussian

thermo {freq} dump 1 all xyz {freq} $f.xyz
log $f.log
timestep 0.001
minimize 1.0e-6 0.001 1000 10000
fix 1 all nvt 0.1 0.1 0.5 #NVT
run 10000

The initial coordinations are:

Position data for Al2Cu crystalline

810 atoms
2 atom types
0 18.189 xlo xhi
0 18.189 ylo yhi
0 36.54 zlo zhi

Atoms

1 1 0.0000 0.0000 3.6540
2 2 0.9340 3.9660 4.8720
3 2 2.0970 0.9340 4.8720
4 2 0.9340 2.0970 2.4360
5 2 3.9660 5.1290 4.8720
6 2 3.9660 0.9340 2.4360
7 2 5.1290 2.0970 4.8720
8 1 0.0000 0.0000 1.2180
9 2 0.9340 3.9660 0.0000
10 2 2.0970 0.9340 0.0000
11 1 3.0320 3.0320 3.6540
12 1 3.0320 3.0320 1.2180
13 2 2.0970 5.1290 2.4360
14 2 5.1290 3.9660 2.4360
15 2 3.9660 5.1290 0.0000
16 2 5.1290 2.0970 0.0000
17 1 12.1260 12.1260 32.8860


Thanks!

I don't see any obvious problems with your script. You'll have
to read the literature about this EAM potential to see if
it is designed for Al2Cu - might be parameterized for some
other alloy. The paper cite is at the top of the file.

Steve