Re: parameters setting in mcsqs

As explained before on this forum: there is a trade off between accuracy and computational cost. Longer range is better, but more expensive. Please read original references on SQS.

Dears :smiley: :
I read a lot of your articles, can you know about the -2-3 -4 choice you said the original reference specifically what ?

see https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevB.42.9622
and perhaps https://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.calphad.2013.06.006