ReaxFF parameter file format error

I want to, in advance, say I’m not sure if this is something I should be asking here but I would appreciate it very much if you’d share your experience.
I am very familiar with ReaxFF and have developed several parameter sets myself, but for the life of me, I can’t figure out what is wrong with this file that I got from this paper:
https://pubs.acs.org/doi/10.1021/acs.jpcb.9b04298?src=getftr&utm_source=sciencedirect_contenthosting&getft_integrator=sciencedirect_contenthosting

NH3_x25.lmpdat (8.1 KB)
substrate_1slab2.lmpdat (161.0 KB)
in_1slab.input (2.3 KB)
COHN.reax (8.4 KB)

I have uploaded some files for you to reproduce. I get this error regarding the Atoms section of the file.
ERROR on proc 0: Not a valid floating-point number: ‘H’ (…/reaxff_ffield.cpp:584)
Last command: pair_coeff * * COHN.reax C O N C C C H H C N H
ORTE_ERROR_LOG: Out of resource in file …/…/…/orte/util/show_help.c at line 501

Which says probably it can’t parse the columns right and it think a floating number should be where ‘H’ atom type is defined.

Thank you very much and I understand if you respond with: this is not a LAMMPS problem.

Please see ERROR on proc 0: Not a valid floating-point number: 'O' (../reaxff_ffield.cpp:584) - #6 by Iakovos_Delasoudas. This seems to be the same issue with a similar but different parameter set.
I can read/parse both files with the latest stable update version and the latest develop version.

The issue in my case was that the parameter set could not support the low gradient vdW correction term. So if you put the lgvdw no maybe will work.

I compiled the lammps-patch_2Apr2025 and I got "not compatible with lgvdW’ error.
and yes

Yes, I removed the lgvdW from the pair_style and it is working now.

This from the documentation helped:
“Note: Force field files are different for the original or lg corrected pair styles, using the wrong ffield file generates an error.”