Terminate a workflow dynamically

FireWorks
1

Hi,
is it possible to terminate the exeution of the (complete) workflow by returning an FWAction?
I am aware of FWAction(defuse_children=True), but I am looking for something stronger that stops other branches as well.

Best Regards,

Henrik

2

Hi Henrik

There is currently no action that defuses other branches of the workflow. It can be added in. One question - how do you want to handle already COMPLETED FireWorks? Should those remain in the COMPLETED state or do you want to revert those to DEFUSED?

Best,

Anubhav

···

On Thu, Dec 17, 2015 at 6:09 AM, Henrik Rusche [email protected] wrote:

Hi,
is it possible to terminate the exeution of the (complete) workflow by returning an FWAction?
I am aware of FWAction(defuse_children=True), but I am looking for something stronger that stops other branches as well.

Best Regards,

Henrik

–

You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups “fireworkflows” group.

To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to [email protected].

To post to this group, send email to [email protected].

Visit this group at https://groups.google.com/group/fireworkflows.

To view this discussion on the web visit https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/fireworkflows/cb935e42-55bd-4396-aca5-f4c9490de246%40googlegroups.com.

For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.

3

Hi Anubhav,

thanks for you swift reply.

I got that impression that there is currently no feature to do this, but
I though that it's better to ask.

I am happy to help with this if you give an idea where to start.

In my case the status of the other FireWorks should be marked COMPLETED
once they are finished.

Henrik

···

On 18/12/15 18:17, Anubhav Jain wrote:

Hi Henrik

There is currently no action that defuses other branches of the
workflow. It can be added in. One question - how do you want to handle
already COMPLETED FireWorks? Should those remain in the COMPLETED
state or do you want to revert those to DEFUSED?

Best,
Anubhav

On Thu, Dec 17, 2015 at 6:09 AM, Henrik Rusche > <henrik...@googlemail.com <mailto:henrik…@googlemail.com>> > wrote:

    Hi,

    is it possible to terminate the exeution of the (complete)
    workflow by returning an FWAction?

    I am aware of FWAction(/defuse_children=True/), but I am looking
    for something stronger that stops other branches as well.

    Best Regards,

    Henrik
    --
    You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google
    Groups "fireworkflows" group.
    To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it,
    send an email to firewo...@googlegroups.com
    <mailto:firewo…@googlegroups.com>.
    To post to this group, send email to
    firewo...@googlegroups.com
    <mailto:firewo…@googlegroups.com>.
    Visit this group at https://groups.google.com/group/fireworkflows.
    To view this discussion on the web visit
    https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/fireworkflows/cb935e42-55bd-4396-aca5-f4c9490de246%40googlegroups.com
    <https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/fireworkflows/cb935e42-55bd-4396-aca5-f4c9490de246%40googlegroups.com?utm_medium=email&utm_source=footer&gt;\.
    For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.

4

Hi Henrik,

I have pushed some code in the latest Github master branch that allows for a “defuse_workflow” argument to FWAction. If set true, it will try to defuse any un-completed and un-fizzled jobs in the rest of the workflow.

It would be very helpful if you could:

i) test this functionality and/or

ii) add a simple unit test to make sure that it continues to work in the future

Best,

Anubhav

···

On Mon, Dec 21, 2015 at 4:44 AM, Henrik Rusche [email protected] wrote:

Hi Anubhav,

  thanks for you swift reply.



  I got that impression that there is currently no feature to do

this, but I though that it’s better to ask.

  I am happy to help with this if you give an idea where to start.



  In my case the status of the other FireWorks should be marked

COMPLETED once they are finished.

  Henrik








  On 18/12/15 18:17, Anubhav Jain wrote:

Hi Henrik

      There is currently no action that defuses other branches of

the workflow. It can be added in. One question - how do you
want to handle already COMPLETED FireWorks? Should those
remain in the COMPLETED state or do you want to revert those
to DEFUSED?

Best,

Anubhav

      On Thu, Dec 17, 2015 at 6:09 AM, Henrik

Rusche [email protected]
wrote:

Hi,

          is it possible to terminate the exeution of the (complete)

workflow by returning an FWAction?

          I am aware of FWAction(*defuse_children=True*              ), but

I am looking for something stronger that stops other
branches as well.

          Best Regards,



          Henrik

            --

            You received this message because you are subscribed to

the Google Groups “fireworkflows” group.

            To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails

from it, send an email to [email protected].

            To post to this group, send email to [email protected].

            Visit this group at [https://groups.google.com/group/fireworkflows](https://groups.google.com/group/fireworkflows).

            To view this discussion on the web visit [](https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/fireworkflows/cb935e42-55bd-4396-aca5-f4c9490de246%40googlegroups.com?utm_medium=email&utm_source=footer)[https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/fireworkflows/cb935e42-55bd-4396-aca5-f4c9490de246%40googlegroups.com](https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/fireworkflows/cb935e42-55bd-4396-aca5-f4c9490de246%40googlegroups.com).

            For more options, visit [https://groups.google.com/d/optout](https://groups.google.com/d/optout).